Loading...
Article: 'News 8' Idol A-ssi sued for sexual assault... Agency claims, "There was consent"
Source: Newsen via Nate
1. [+294, -13] Second generation idol group... five members... it's that one group with the problematic member
2. [+172, -14] Song Kang Ho: This is the kingdom of r*pe!!!!!!!
3. [+159, -7] So who is it
4. [+44, -18] I'm a woman too but I don't understand why she didn't report it right after it happened. Why was she at his home with him? Why not kick him away if she didn't want to do it or move?
5. [+40, -43] After 9 years? ㅋㅋ She's a kkot-baem ㅎ.. just take your money and go ㅎ
6. [+33, -7] I'm not even curious anymore. So many ridiculous celebrities these days that they all seem one and the same to me now.
7. [+32, -25] Why did she open the door for him? Why did she lay beside him in bed then?;;;;
8. [+31, -23] This is just too much. She opened the door for him and is claiming she got r*ped in her own home, who would believe that? And it happened 9 years ago. What does she want now? Money?
9. [+30, -18] So she let him in because he wanted to sleep and she really thought "sleep" was the only thing that was going to happen? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
10. [+29, -4] I'm sure investigations will reveal the truth but K-Pop's image is really turning to sh*t these days;
11. [+26, -7] Is there even a way to prove something that happened 9 years ago? She should've reported it when there was physical evidence. How does she expect him to be thrown in jail when she's 9 years late in reporting it?
12. [+19, -27] After 9 years??? She must need money.
-
Source: Nate
1. [+122, -12] Where's all the news about Jang Ja Yeon, sigh..
2. [+80, -8] Apparently it's Double S 5~'s K H Joon??
3. [+51, -4] Sounds like a really old idol group...
4. [+15, -6] Probably a C-tier idol who isn't that famous..;;
5. [+11, -6] I'm your man~ daraddaddda~
6. [+6, -3] So it happened 9 years ago. He was drunk and came to her to ask her for a place to sleep. She opened the door for him and voluntarily laid down next to him~ How can any of this be proven? 99% that this ends up being buried with no real results. Why was she quiet during the #metoo campaign? Why decide to sue now when Seungri and Jung Jun Young's scandals are going on? Anyway, don't most women know that drunk men are h*rnier? Unless they were already very close, she wouldn't have opened the door for him, let alone lay down next to him, which is an indirect form of consent as well, no? I logically don't understand~
-
Source: Naver
1. [+1,101, -147] Intercourse without consent is r*pe, you criminals
2. [+616, -47] Whether someone is in your home or a motel, it shouldn't matter if they don't consent to you. Continuing to do so is force and r*pe and sexual assault...
3. [+421, -155] To all you pathetic men defending him... whether a woman follows you into a motel or your own home, forcing yourself on her without consent is considered r*pe ^^ there's no such thing as indirect consent, you know that right? It's 2019, think about it...
4. [+202, -43] R*pe exists even between married couples... consent is real. If they don't want to do it, you shouldn't do it. That's the law, you pathetic men.
5. [+63, -6] Do you idiots really believe that just because you're in someone's home, you're allowed to r*pe them?
-
Source: Naver
1. [+396, -13] This is crazy ㅋㅋㅋㅋ a new scandal every day. So what's going on with Jang Ja Yeon's scandal?
2. [+196, -14] How is this a country? Not a day goes by where we don't have a s*x scandal
3. [+106, -5] So who is it?
4. [+62, -6] Of all the times to be on a South American tour right now...
5. [+24, -4] So many people with weird logic here... you're not allowed to have s*x with someone just because you go over to their house... That's like saying you're allowed to r*pe your wife all the time just because you're married.
6. [+43, -25] Apparently it's SS501
-
Source: Naver
1. [+4,795, -917] So it's not like they were drinking together at her home... He was out drinking and then came over to her house asking to sleep and she opened the door for him and laid in bed with him.. that's a bit.. wrong. I don't know what made her keep this to herself for 9 years before deciding to sue now but if she has experience working at a bar, I'm sure she's mentally stronger than this. Maybe she thought it was sexual assault but if she's suing him for other reasons now, I hope she reconsiders because this just makes other victims look like kkot-baems too..
2. [+1,953, -358] I won't believe anything anymore until investigation results are out
3. [+1,032, -225] Something about this one smells fishy ㅎㅎ
4. [+734, -109] Even as a woman, I don't get what she was thinking. She's not a baby... She offered to let him sleep at her home and even laid down in bed with him, the intentions were obvious~ If she really didn't want to sleep with him, she wouldn't have let him in her home, let alone lay down in bed with him.
5. [+621, -252] You guys are basically assaulting her a second time. Investigations will reveal the truth but just because she let him in her home does not mean she consented to s*x. Even laying down in the same bed as him isn't consent either. Any s*x without consent is r*pe. Please stop making your own assumptions ㅠㅠ there's no such thing as indirect consent.
6. [+421, -65] What I want to know is what she was thinking laying down with him?
-
Loading...